Community vs. the New Supreme Court Nominee, continued

We continue our meditation with lawyer-with-a-conscience Peter Gabel.*  When we put the “founding fathers” on a pedestal, hagiography like, and claim they had all the answers about everything right up to today, we are engaged in fetishism or idolatry.  It boggles the mind that any human being would want to spend their time pursuing the literalism of the founding document—one can recognize a parallel among religious seekers who squat on Biblical texts their whole life long.

Bumper sticker of the King James Only sect. Photo from the If It Ain’t King James It Ain’t Bible Facebook community.

Says Gabel:

The bureaucratic meaning reflected in the work of Barrett and others is that the judge must engage in the quite prosaic task of discerning the so-called ‘objective public meaning’ of a group of words penned in and around 1789 and applying that ancient meaning to interpreting the validity of laws and statutes today, as well as to the text of the Constitution itself.

For me, this explains Barrett’s indifference (and that of five others on the current Supreme Court) to the suffering of so many people that is going on in the world around them.

Gabel warns that this situation

“Constitution Center, Philadelphia.” Photo by Scutter on Flickr.

…will enable Judge Barrett both to strike down progressive legislation like the Affordable Care Act, and refuse to extend constitutional protection to rights and activities not explicitly named in the original document or its amendments (such as the right to abortion and gay marriage).  As a kind of legal philologist who simply interprets words from long ago according to their original public meaning, Barrett can say, ‘this activity is not liberal or conservative and does not reflect my opinions about these matters—it is rather just a matter of interpreting a text the only way it can be interpreted in accordance with democracy.

Notice how this “interpretation of texts” so parallels fundamentalist Bibliolaters who want to believe all religion is found in a book of long ago. Gabel asks:

“Signing of the United States Constitution with George Washington, Benjamin Franklin, and Alexander Hamilton” (left to right in the foreground). Painting by Howard Chandler Christy on Wikimedia Commons.

Why should we care AT ALL about what a group of mainly 20 and 30-year old white male property-owning, in some cases slaveholders would think—as if we could know that—about what we are doing in the present-day world?

In the past 250 years,

magnificent social movements rose up to advance the political and moral understanding of man-and-womankind. The idea that we should discard the wisdom that we have gained across all of that historical time when we today determine the meaning of the Constitution and the validity of democratically-passed legislation is just absurd on its face…or ought to be.

Why isn’t it?

Gabel believes that it has arisen, beginning in the 1980’s, with a growing authoritarianism that brings with it a ‘Founding Father Knows Best’ mentality.

Jair Bolsonaro of Brazil and Donald Trump, authoritarians united in denying climate change, the human rights of their citizens, and the risks of the coronavirus. (Official White House Photo by Tia Dufour, on Flickr)

To me, a “growing authoritarianism” is another way of talking about patriarchy at its worst–pedestal pieties, power-over dynamics, fascism, “only I can fix it” messaging.  Such dynamics are burgeoning around the world in places like Hungary, Poland, Brazil, and of course the U.S. with Trumpism.  Father always knows best.  And, as linguist George Lakoff has pointed out, the God of fundamentalism is invariably a “Punitive Father God.”

*The article we are dialoging with can be found in:

For more on “Founding Father Knows Best,” see Peter Gabel, (

See Matthew Fox, The Pope’s War: How Ratzinger’s Crusade Imperiled the Church and HOW IT Can Be Saved, pp. 106-144;

Matthew Fox, Confessions: The Making of a Post-Denominational Priest, pp. 179-195, 249-270.

Banner Image: President Lyndon B. Johnson signs the 1964 Civil Rights Act as Martin Luther King, Jr., and others, look on. The Act was immediately challenged and upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in the landmark case Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States. Photo by Cecil Stoughton, White House Press Office, Wikimedia Commons.

Do you sense a “growing authoritarianism” happening at home and around the world and beginning in the 1980’s?  Why do you think this is happening?  What kind of resistance is possible and effective?

The Pope’s War: Why Ratzinger’s Secret Crusade Has Imperiled the Church and How It Can Be Saved

The Pope’s War offers a provocative look at three decades of corruption in the Catholic Church, focusing on Josef Ratzinger, Pope Benedict XVI. The final section in the book focuses on birthing a truly catholic christianity.
“This book should be read by everybody, not only for its ferocious courage, but also for its vision for what needs to be saved from the destructive forces that threaten authentic Christianity.” ~ Andrew Harvey, author of The Hope.
“In the gripping The Pope’s War, Matthew Fox takes an unwavering look at the layers of corruption in the Catholic Church, holding moral truth against power.”   — Jason Berry, author of Vows of Silence: The Abuse of Power in the Papacy of John Paul II

Responses are welcomed. To add your comment, please click HERE or scroll to the bottom of the page.

Share this meditation


Daily Meditations with Matthew Fox is made possible through the generosity of donors. Please consider making a tax-deductible donation

Search Meditations





Receive our daily meditations

7 thoughts on “Community vs. the New Supreme Court Nominee, continued”

  1. Avatar

    The phenomenon of brain washing is very real and devastating to a person’s ability to see outside of the box. It actually amounts to creating an inner reality based upon limiting structured beliefs that become the lens through which all reality is viewed. Placing people who are victims of this type of prison in positions of power is to potentially compromise the freedom of those subject to that authority. The grievous nature of ramming through this nominee to the Supreme Court is obvious. Perhaps ultimately the collective unified consciousness of evolved humans will be sufficient to balance the scales of justice.

  2. Avatar

    Thank you Matthew!
    I too am struck by the correlation between the conservative interpretation of the constitution and the evangelical interpretation of the Bible.
    Would love to hear other’s thoughts.

  3. Avatar

    I doubt that the Founding Fathers could have envisioned Facebook (1st Amendment) or AK 47’s (2nd Amendment). Many things that have happened since the Constitution was written must be interpreted in the law (as you and Peter say Matthew), not just blindly accepted or refuted as “truth”.

    1. Rev. Dr. Richard Reich-Kuykendall
      Rev. Dr. Richard Reich-Kuykendall

      And we at Daily Meditations with Matthew Fox agree with you as well as with the earlier comments…

  4. Avatar

    Dear Matthew, I agree with your thoughts and findings. I have a hard time staying calm at this time and would love some thoughts about how to handle all this right now.

    1. Matthew Fox

      Dear Margaret,

      I agree it is a trying time for all. A few suggestions:

      1. Turn off tv and internet news when the news becomes too much.
      2) get outdoors and try to do some exercise as well; take care of your body.
      3) Invest some of your nervous energy into working for what your conscience dictates, whether doing phone banking for candidates you believe in, volunteering at polling places, driving people to vote, etc.
      4) Meditate in whatever format works for you.
      5) Listen to music that calms your mind.
      6) Read the mystics or Scriptures and create mantras from them that you repeat over and over.
      7) Get a drum and beat it 15 minutes daily as you would if grieving.

Leave a Comment

To help moderate the volume of responses, the Comment field is limited to 1500 characters (roughly 300 words), with one comment per person per day.

Please keep your comments focused on the topic of the day's Meditation.

As always, we look forward to your comments!!
The Daily Meditation Team

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join us in meditation that supports your compassionate action

Receive Matthew Fox's Daily Meditation by subscribing below: