Rationalism and Reductionism vs. Intuition and Creativity

The sixth chakra concerns our “third eye,” intuition, and the bringing together of our left and right hemisphere of the brain in creativity. This is, of course, a description of when things work out well. The opposite situation, i.e. the illness of the soul that must be overcome to reach such optimal balance, is brought about when the rational part of the mind dominates the intuitive part, disregarding and berating the latter. Or, in less crude versions, keeping it down and giving it the role of a helper.

“Intuition vs Logic: Which is Better for Decision Making?” The Self Eye

I think we can pair the sixth chakra to the traditional capital sin of superbia (in Latin) which can be translated as “excessive pride” or “boasting” or “arrogance.” It is indeed best seen in Western arrogance and its boasting about its scientific and technological achievements in the last three centuries or so, accompanied by the demise of the intuitive mind and creativity.

Cultural movements, like 19th century Romanticism, have represented attempts to counteract the arrogance of the intellect, bringing back a more balanced situation, but they have failed in the main. Creation Spirituality is, of course, another of such countercultural movements, with the specificity of being an ally of contemporary science, to the extent that the latter moves away from the one-sidedness, the materialism, and the denial of mystical experience that was typical of 19th century Positivism and is, unfortunately, still widespread today.

Matthew Fox explains the dangers of rationalism and reductionism in his book Sins of the Spirit, Blessings of the Flesh, as well as in many other publications. Rationalism means the arrogance of the rational mind which refuses to give much importance to imagination, intuition, creativity.

Reductionism is a step further, consisting of “explaining away” human experiences which, in reality, cannot be grasped by the intellect alone. Matthew quotes Paul Ricoeur when he says that “one lives only that which one imagines” and comments as follows: Life itself, after all, is not rational. It is the ultimate marvel of the more-than-rational. The modern era, with its dependency on the Cartesian philosophical model of “clear and distinct ideas” and the quantitative method of science, ignored feelings and intuition (…) This rationalism easily translates into faceless and fleshless statistics that encourage greed and exploitation of people and earthlings while creating pseudo-ecstasies of money and power and other abstractions. But the sixth chakra has the potential to melt these idols down into real life once again.

Albert Einstein, one of our most brilliant minds, honored the power of our intuition. Wikimedia Commons

None of this means that we should privilege fanciful thoughts at the expense of reason. In fact, we are not creative without an intellectual life of some kind. Ideas count. Logic has its place. The problem is that we are out of balance. We don’t give enough importance to our intuitions. We prefer to live in safety rather than following such intuitions, even though they give us very important information about what truly matters for our happiness. We live in abstractions, being convinced that certain fixed ideas that we hold are absolutely true. We say: “This is the rational way” because we don’t allow any contamination of our ideas with the messy reality of intuition and creativity. In reality, this is only an expression of the arrogance of the rational mind, mostly connected to the left hemisphere of the brain, which thinks to be the whole instead of accepting it is just half of the whole.

One important corollary of this insight is that dogmatism — which Matthew loves to pair with pessimism in the definition given by Thomas Aquinas as “contraction of the mind” — is not confined to religion. Yes, it is very visibly propounded by all sorts of fundamentalisms, but science has also been involved in dogmas and attitudes that have restricted our capacities to feel, experience, sense, know, perceive, savor, observe, taste, and enjoy. In reality, even the great scientific discoveries of modern times have been helped by intuition, having been made by individuals who tried new untrodden paths.

On a personal level, the cure to stiffness in the sixth chakra is, of course, trusting our intuition. This might be difficult to do if we are not used to it. We need to train ourselves step by step, especially if we have been raised in a strictly modern household, and it is important to accept that we may “overtrust” as well as “undertrust” until we achieve a proper balance.

“Eileen Crist: Confronting Anthropocentrism.” IntlForum

It is interesting to observe that Matthew does not explicitly talk about arrogance in his chapter on the sixth chakra. That is because he has already talked about it with regard to the first chakra. Arrogance may result indeed from acedia/sloth, in the sense that indifference toward life tends to turn into a negative judgment of everything, and finally into the perception of being the only one who knows anything, or has any importance.

This is “vainglory” in the words of St. Gregory the Great, which consists of an inordinate desire to announce one’s own excellence. But isn’t that precisely what the Western man has done? Arrogance is embodied in the sin of anthropocentrism, but also in that of racism. Even though today’s Western arrogance is not explicitly buttressed by pseudo-scientific claims about the superiority of the “white race” we are not very far from it.

Once again, we observe that working on the capital sins of the Catholic tradition and the chakras of the Hindu tradition brings us directly into the core of the problems that we are living today, both on the personal and the societal level.


Matthew Fox, Sins of the Spirit, Blessings of the Flesh, pp. 293, 299, 305, 307, 193.

Banner image: Marking the third eye. In Hinduism, the tilaka, colloquially known as a tika, is a mark made with paste or powder and usually worn on the forehead, at the point of the ajna, or third eye chakra. Photo by Jayendra Lashkari, CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikiquote.


Queries for Contemplation

What is my relationship with my intuitive mind? Do I sometimes take abstractions
for the whole truth?


Related Readings by Matthew Fox

Sins of the Spirit, Blessings of the Flesh: Transforming Evil in Soul and Society

Visionary theologian and best-selling author Matthew Fox offers a new theology of evil that fundamentally changes the traditional perception of good and evil and points the way to a more enlightened treatment of ourselves, one another, and all of nature. In comparing the Eastern tradition of the 7 chakras to the Western tradition of the 7 capital sins, Fox allows us to think creatively about our capacity for personal and institutional evil and what we can do about them. 
“A scholarly masterpiece embodying a better vision and depth of perception far beyond the grasp of any one single science.  A breath-taking analysis.” — Diarmuid O’Murchu, author of Quantum Theology: Spiritual Implications of the New Physics

Creativity: Where the Divine and Human Meet

Because creativity is the key to both our genius and beauty as a species but also to our capacity for evil, we need to teach creativity and to teach ways of steering this God-like power in directions that promote love of life (biophilia) and not love of death (necrophilia). Pushing well beyond the bounds of conventional Christian doctrine, Fox’s focus on creativity attempts nothing less than to shape a new ethic.
“Matt Fox is a pilgrim who seeks a path into the church of tomorrow.  Countless numbers will be happy to follow his lead.” –Bishop John Shelby Spong, author, Rescuing the Bible from FundamentalismLiving in Sin

The A.W.E. Project: Reinventing Education, Reinventing the Human

The A.W.E. Project reminds us that awe is the appropriate response to the unfathomable wonder that is creation… A.W.E. is also the acronym for Fox’s proposed style of learning – an approach to balance the three R’s. This approach to learning, eldering, and mentoring is intelligent enough to honor the teachings of the Ancestors, to nurture Wisdom in addition to imparting knowledge, and to Educate through Fox’s 10 C’s. The 10 C’s are the core of the A.W.E. philosophy and process of education, and include: compassion, contemplation, and creativity. The A.W.E. Project does for the vast subject of “learning” what Fox’s Reinvention of Work did for vocation and Original Blessing did for theology. Included in the book is a dvd of the 10 C’s put to 10 video raps created and performed by Professor Pitt.
An awe-based vision of educational renewal.Frederic and Mary Ann Brussat, Spirituality and Practice.

Natural Grace: Dialogues on Creation, Darkness, and the Soul in Spirituality and Science 
by Matthew Fox and Rupert Sheldrake

Natural Grace, a 208 page inspired dialogue between theologian Matthew Fox and scientist Rupert Sheldrake, unites wisdom and knowledge from unconventional angles. Considering themselves heretics in their own fields, Matthew and Rupert engage the conversation from postmodern and post-postmodern perspectives, deconstructing both religion and science—while setting the foundation for a new emerging worldview. Having outgrown the paradigms in which they were raised, both Fox and Sheldrake see it as part of their life missions to share the natural synthesis of spirituality and science rooted in a paradigm of evolutionary cosmology.

Responses are welcomed. To add your comment, please click HERE or scroll to the bottom of the page.

Share this meditation

Facebook
Twitter
Email

Daily Meditations with Matthew Fox is made possible through the generosity of donors. Please consider making a tax-deductible donation

Search Meditations

Categories

Categories

Archives

Archives

Receive our daily meditations

6 thoughts on “Rationalism and Reductionism vs. Intuition and Creativity”

  1. The ‘Truth’ is an abstraction clothed in Mystery, but it the other side of the same coin is ‘Love’. — BB.

  2. Jo Anne Bennett

    Romanticism, hmmmmm
    I’ve spent the last 4 months working on my husband’s manuscript about a 20th century Romantic, someone who as a child experienced frequent trance-like states; someone who lost his sight in WWI but regained it after a vision of himself saving the world. Someone who went into raptures during Wagner’s operas, who saw ´Tristan and Isolde’ 40 times when he was still a half-starving young man; someone who at the height of his success, said “My deepest wish would be to be able to wander in Italy as an unknown painter.”
    Someone who was the main person responsible for the deaths of 85 million people, 9 million by industrial murder.
    You know who this was.
    So, I’m having a bit of trouble here – how does something that sounds like mysticism turn so hideous?

    1. Gianluigi Gugliermetto
      Gianluigi Gugliermetto

      Some responses, all of which would deserve elaboration, come to mind:

      1. deranged men can exploit any kind of ideas to get what they want; I don’t think that any scholar of Romanticism, even the most critical ones, would consider the person you allude to as a representative of the Romantic movement;

      2. imbalance can happen also by excess on the side of intuition and imagination, putting aside reason; even though this is not really what happened in the case you allude to because – as you say – mass industrial murder was involved, and you need rationality to do that, and more specifically rationality devoid of feeling;

      3. I am not alone in saying that Romanticism should be counted as a counter-cultural movement, even though this position can be criticized, of course. The case is made, for example, by Charlene Spretnak in The Resurgence of the Real.

  3. Thank you DM team for including the brilliant spiritual analysis of the societal and cultural sin of Western civilization and its history of destructiveness to humanity and Our Beautiful Sacred Mother Earth found in the enclosed YouTube video, “Eileen Crist: Confronting Anthropocentrism.” Other philosophers, social critics, cosmologists, spiritual teachers, mystics, prophets, channelers, and shamans with their Indigenous wisdom have also warned Us that this anthropocentrism, closely related to our limited duality consciousness, of Western civilization is endangering our human species and Our Sacred Planet/Mother Earth/Her living creatures. Past civilizations have also been destroyed in the history of human evolution due to similar human sins of egocentric and anthropocentric limited consciousness with its manifestations of wars, racism, power, control, greed, materialism, injustices, cruelty, and suffering… The continued essential importance of FAITH on Our personal and Communal spiritual journeys with-in Our SOURCE~CO-CREATOR’S SPIRIT of DIVINE LOVE~WISDOM PRESENT within and among Us, in All physical and nonphysical spiritual dimensions, Is ongoing towards Our evolution of human consciousness/Eternal Souls of LOVING DIVERSE ONENESS~COSMIC CHRIST CONSCIOUSNESS in the Sacred Process of the ETERNAL PRESENT MOMENT….

  4. What is my relationship with the intuitive mind? As a playwright, I begin writing almost exclusively with the intuitive mind. I am told not to do this. I’m told I should begin with an outline and a clear idea of the direction the play is to take. But that approach bypasses the intuitive mind, and I can’t imagine a play developing with any charm, art, deep meaning, ground-breaking ideas, or delight were I to use that approach. Other writers might write well using an outline. Good for them. Possibly, that results in a producible play. For me, I prefer opening myself to intuition and mystery. My approach does sometimes leave me in a difficult situation, however—such as in my play “This One Wild and Precious Life” in which I used a lot of Mary Oliver poetry and was therefore left with an unproducible play when I couldn’t get the rights to her poems. For me, the rational mind comes later in the editing process. Who knows? I may be able to replace Oliver’s poetry with poems by highly acclaimed friend who is open to me using her poetry. The point is, it probably wouldn’t hurt for me to balance my intuition with a slightly more rational approach. lol

  5. Eugenics is also part of the “rationale” for white supremacy/Christian nationalism and is alive and well today, as it was for Hitler and the KuKluxKlan. I know for myself that I can rationalize anything. Imagination can be every bit as dangerous as reason, when taken to extremes. One’s relationship to the intuitive mind maybe should be checked and measured against the community’s understanding. Arrogance can spring from the heart as well as from the mind IMO..

Leave a Comment

To help moderate the volume of responses, the Comment field is limited to 1500 characters (roughly 300 words), with one comment per person per day.

Please keep your comments focused on the topic of the day's Meditation.

As always, we look forward to your comments!!
The Daily Meditation Team

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join us in meditation that supports your compassionate action

Receive Matthew Fox's Daily Meditation by subscribing below: